Crime without Punishment

the journey from means to ends


Thor May
Brisbane, 2014

Image credit: Hugh Macleod @

Sooner or later everyone – individuals, governments, companies – has to make choices about whether to put aside certain values to achieve a desired end. Michael Pascoe, an Australian financial journalist, has recently discussed this at


Preface: This is a discussion paper, not a researched academic document. The reading list at the end is a collection of contemporary links from the Internet and pretty accidental, not edited for quality. The author is a principal organizer for a Brisbane, Australia, discussion group whose members come from diverse backgrounds, and which deals with an eclectic collection of topics. Where a topic is of broad general interest I have adopted the practice of posting discussion starters like the present one on in the hope that others might also find them worth thinking about.


1. Actual Vs hypothetical choices of ends and means


In the real world of events, as opposed to philosophical statements of “should”, decisions about ends and means always come down to who, if anybody, is responsible for consequences. Where consequences are not clear for actors, and especially if consequences are not personal, almost any ends can be argued for, and almost any means might be rationalized. For this reason, the reading list at the end of these notes is slanted towards a focus on real world situations.


2. The spectrum of human actions used to achieve endsMeans&Ends2.jpg


Action affecting other people can be usefully put in a means=>end frame.  That is, how do means (actions) which the actor(s) initiates contribute to some end, and what are the consequences for other people? The range of actions available usually depends upon the relationship between the actor(s) and the affected party (or parties), and also whether that party is the main target of the action, or merely a collateral participant. Of course, not all actions are intended to affect other people, but they usually do in some way. Human targeted actions to achieve some end can be seen as a continuum ranging from cooperation > directive > co-option > corruption > intimidation > coercion > extortion >violence.


3. The displacement of responsibility when people act in groups


As individuals most of us (but not all of us) prefer to dwell at the gentler end of the continuum of targeted actions. As we move up the scale towards violence, our rationale for action becomes more difficult to justify to ourselves and to others. However, humans also act as groups, delegating responsibility and culpability for their actions to leaders, or even to abstractions like regulations and laws. The groups might be quite intimate, they might be mobs, they might be religious, related to employment, or devolved to governments at various levels, or even trans-national organizations. As these groups become more abstracted from the individual, most people feel much less difficulty in justifying actions which they perhaps could not contemplate as individuals. This is because they generally become less responsible for consequences, less likely to be punished for poor judgement, and are quite likely to have no personal acquaintance with the people who will be affected by their actions.


4. The industrialization of remote and official actions targeting individuals


The displacement of responsibility to groups has always existed in human societies. However, the 20th Century saw an “advance” in the removal of personal responsibility with the emergence of mass political movements, and then total warfare. The early 21st Century has seen another ominous “advance” of this kind. Whatever the depredations of earlier mass abuses, they tended to be somewhat uneven because of the sheer inefficiency, not to say the stupidity of individual agents within organizations. World War II gave rise to an expressive acronym: SNAFU => situation normal, all fucked up. In the 21st Century this accidentally benevolent incompetence has been drastically reduced though the relentless penetration of computing and the Internet into all of our lives. That is, computing has automated millions of actions which used to depend upon routine but unreliable human intervention.

On the other hand, the number of people rapidly affected by single acts of incompetence or malice has exponentially increased. A simple example would be a computer virus with which one rogue operator can affect millions of people. When the rogue operator is an organization or government, the outcomes can be catastrophic. That is, group actions, especially at the worst end of the spectrum, have been industrialized, while negative consequences for the actors are almost eliminated. Even warfare is conducted as a computer game remote from individuals who are targeted to be assassinated by aerial drones. Our privacy, our personal freedoms and our powers to react to abuse are teetering on extinction. The popular imagination has not really grasped the nature or extent of this loss.

These notes will look first at the compromises which we all make between means and ends. It will go on to outline and document the increasing subordination of ends we think we are pursuing by organizational agencies mindlessly pursuing means with industrial efficiency while evading all responsibility for the carnage resulting from their actions.


5. Mary-Lou and the pitch for a rich guy


Mary-Lou has decided to pitch for a rich guy. Really, she doesn’t love the rich guy, and in fact there is not much to love about him. On the other hand he can provide the material life to which she aspires, and even if things fall apart, she can walk away with enough gold coins to keep her in comfort for life. For that matter, the rich guy thinks he is getting a trophy wife and a sex slave in one package. That is, at least for a while, both parties are satisfied that their personal objectives justify a (sham?) public marriage. Means justify the ends. OK, this scenario is a cliché – or is it? Pick your scandal story of the hour. Perhaps Wendi Deng and Rupert Murdoch. Or even find the Internet site to help it all happen. In Australia in 2013, through the website, according to company figures, there are roughly 7680 sugar babies in Queensland seeking various types of arrangements, and 530 "sugar daddies" and "sugar mommies" willing to offer their support.  The numbers were far greater in Sydney, where there were 14,500 sugar babies, 800 sugar daddies and mommies last year. Melbourne had 9210 sugar babies, and 640 sugar daddies and mommies….  Company spokeswoman Jennifer Gwynn said that … these “sugar babies” stood to receive approximately $3000 a month in allowances and gifts from a willing Sugar Daddy to help cover tuition and living expenses…. But she said it was not prostitution” (Feeney, 2013). Yes, quite. But whatever we think of Mary-Lou and her sugar daddy, it is a personal compromise between consenting adults. As far as we can tell, nobody else is going to get hurt.


6. Dagwood wants a promotion


The high school debating hero brimming with ideals is usually a very different individual from his reincarnation at 30, now with a wife and child, a mortgage, and his feet on the promotion escalator which nourishes career ambition. In other words, the for the teen the prime end of his actions and expressed opinions was peer respect and female admiration. With those ends in mind he had every incentive to pose as something which the ideals of his peer group would share. Displaced to a war situation, he might even rush out of his fox hole to collect either a bullet or a medal for bravery.


As a 30 year old organization-man, our ex-teenage hero is trapped in layered institutional agendas over which he has little control. He finds himself being required to do things which affect strangers outside of the company, and perhaps do them damage. He learns not to think too hard about this. He perceives a road map to higher earnings, higher status and, he tells himself, one day he will have the actual power to do things as his teenage alter ego thought they should be done. However there are obstacles, and they mostly take the form of other people in his workplace. His peers are now his competitors, and his stupid superiors are persons of influence to be cultivated. Dagwood knows that Axlerod, whom he went to school with, is his only serious competitor for the upcoming line manager’s job. He has the dirt on Axlerod; they used to be friends. It is so easy to let slip a little interesting gossip about the guy that will surely reach HR. Nobody else needs to know where the damage came from. Dagwood has taken his first slippery step on the long, greasy road to the top. When he finally gets there he will no longer have those teenage values from long ago, but he doesn’t know this yet. Nor does he know that at 40 he will pass a hidden red traffic light, and be considered “over the hill”. It is a perverse fact of life that the very attributes and behaviours which Dagwood’s teenage alter ego thought should be a barrier to achieving ends - incompetence, arrogance, ruthlessness and selfishness, together with spinelessness, laggardness and drunkenness - are apparently necessary qualifications for achieving success in most Australian organizations (Colquhoun 2013).


7. The killing fields of invisible unemployment


Smith is good at what he does, and at 45 he is at the top of his game. For twenty years he has developed expertise for the IT needs of a large organization. He is a technologist, not a politician or a bean counter, but he knows that without people like him the whole organization would grind to a halt. Therefore he was shocked when following a board shuffle nine months ago he was sent off with a redundancy package. The new board members were confident that outsourcing was the way to go, would save a large chunk of operating costs, would devolve responsibility for implementation failures to contractors, and would burnish their reputations as hot-shot directors. The simple means to so many desirable ends was a slam-dunk for them. Nine months down the track the company is teetering for a cascading collection of reasons, but the directors are too insulated to have grasped this yet, and Smith, well he is sitting in his pyjamas at home writing job application letters.


If Smith was shocked by the perverse behaviour of his employers, he has been demoralized to find that the large number of very well-paying positions advertised for someone with just his skills have actually evaporated when it came down to the nitty-gritty of applying for them. Smith has even obtained professional assistance to polish his CV. Regardless, companies and employment agencies have demanded extensive, time-consuming documentation to come with any application. They have demanded the contacts of referees, a depreciating resource if they are contacted too often. In spite of jumping through all the hoops, Smith has received only a handful of responses to many applications. Several agencies have told him candidly that he is “too hold”, and a couple of others that his is “overqualified”, whatever that means. He did manage to get a couple of interviews, only to realize that the interviewing panels not only had not read his CV, but that they were treating him as a fill-in to justify the hiring process for an insider they had already selected. At last, sadder but wiser, he researched the market and learned that the majority of advertised positions were fakes. Government departments and universities with their elaborate compliance regulations were the worst offenders in this fake job charade. The means to an end for them was to tick the boxes they needed to tick before following their true intention. The employment agencies were indistinguishable in their methods from real estate agencies. For such businesses, the means for putting up a public front of enormous demand and activity was to churn advertisements for obsolete job vacancies constantly.  The needs of the long suffering unemployed who had the least available resources, figured nowhere in the calculations of businesses, agencies or governments (Featherston 2014, “How Many Job Ads Are Fake?”).


8. The killing fields of invisible enemies


This section looks at the 9/11 Attack and the ensuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as examples of the extreme corruption of ends and means in human behaviour. Countless other examples could have been chosen, but these particular wars are familiar to many readers from the contemporary political narrative.


Wikipedia tells us that “"The September 11 attacks (also referred to as September 11, September 11th, or 9/11) were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks launched by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda upon the United States in New York City and the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area on Tuesday, September 11, 2001" (Wikipedia 2014, “September 11 attacks”). The world has not been the same since. The real origins of the 9/11 attacks have been hotly disputed (Wikipedia 2014 “0/11 Conspiracy Theories”). I am personally agnostic about whether the events were purely an Al Qaeda operation, and it will probably take a generation to learn the whole story (or maybe never). What is beyond doubt however is that 9/11 set in train a cornucopia of agendas within America and beyond it. If Osama bin Laden set out to disrupt the prevailing cultures of Western civilization he succeeded beyond his wildest dreams, not from Al Qaeda’s actions per se,  but by the self-destruction of America’s claimed values through American responses, both nationally and internationally.


Of all human behaviours warfare always engages the most advanced technology of the age at the service of the most primitive instincts. It is a cliché that the first casualty of war is the truth. This is a way of saying that publicly announced ends become tactical lies, altered to justify the employed means of destruction. The 9/11 attacks gave rise to two wars against sovereign nations, Iraq and Afghanistan, by the United States. Neither of those states were paragons of good government, but neither were either of them a significant threat to the United States. War was declared against them by the United States in the name of crushing Al Qaeda. The overwhelming source for Al Qaeda recruits, Saudi Arabia received no sanction at all. Indeed its leaders deepened their intimacy with the American president of the day.


The case for war was fabricated, and later shown to be entirely based on lies. There were no consequences for actors in the American administration, but civil society in Iraq was destroyed and estimates of death from the conflict range from 110,600 to over a million (Wikipedia 2014, “Casualties of the Iraq War”), entirely dwarfing the 3,000 lost in the 9/11 attack. All of this for a population which had no connection whatsoever with Al Qaeda’s operations. In Afghanistan, tens of thousands of people have become casualties in an indefensible war (Wikipedia 2014 "Civilian casualties in the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)".  America has not won these wars, nor achieved strategic objectives even using the blood and iron rationale of empire building. By any reasonable metric, these wars were vast American war crimes, yet this is a verdict unacceptable to the American public’s self-image.


Have the wars in fact reduced terrorist threats in continental America or worldwide? No, they have amplified the threats by recruiting whole populations now antagonistic to America, and domestically they have led to the emasculation of so-called American freedoms in the name of the Patriot Act, as well as the growth of an out-of-control surveillance culture through the NSA – spying on all the personal communications of ordinary Americans, the citizens of other nations worldwide, and even members of Congress in Washington. That is, actions in the name of security have generated ever greater insecurity for everyone.  


If we follow the money of course, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have depleted the public Treasury of the United States, almost fatally, but immeasurably enriched an elite group of arms manufacturers, contractors, and their camp followers of prostituted politicians.


For our discussion purposes here, warfare of the kind just described poses a puzzle for any assumption of defensible ends and rational means. It is only explicable, to me at least, by recognizing that many thousands of individuals acting within the shell of organizations, have abandoned personal responsibility for the ways that their behaviour has impacted upon strangers with whom they have no connection except through a narrative of imaginary terror. They have learned to fear fear itself, and in attacking their nightmares have wreaked havoc upon innocent others.



Reading List


Axestopper, Pete (14 October 2013) "Means VsEnds". website, online @

Bainbridge, Stephen M. (February 2002) "Director Primacy: The Means and Ends of Corporate Governance". Social Science Research Network website, online @

Colquhoun, Steve (October 22, 2013) "Is our workplace culture broken?". Brisbane Times online @

Featherston, Tony (April 10, 2014) "How many job ads are fake?". [recommended article, especially the comments] Brisbane Times online @

Feeney, Catherine (February 1, 2013) "'Sugar daddies' a learning experience for students". Brisbane Times online @

Goodreads (2014) "Quotes about Means and Ends". Goodreads website, online @

Got Questions Ministries (2014) "Do the ends justify the means?". [Christian Bible site], Got Questions Ministries website online @

Governor, James (25 September 2009) “It’s easy to spot a purist”. James Governor’s Monkchips blog, online @

Gregory, Robin (2012) "Separating Means from Ends". Structured Decision Making website, online @

Griffin, Rebecca(April 8, 2014) "I hope Dianne Feinstein is emotional about torture".
Of Means and Ends blog - an organizer's take on progressive politics and strategy, website online @

Grinstein, Gidi (04/15/2014) "The Essential Architecture of Small-Scale Networks". Huffington Post online @

Hoare, Barry (n.d.) "Ends 'n Means Comic". EndsnMeans blog, online @ 

Huxley, Aldous (1946) Ends and Means [novel]. Full text at website, online @

Jarche, Harold (2007) "Confusing Means and Ends". Harold Jarche blog, online @

Macleod, Hugh (n.d.) GapingVoid Gallery website @

May, Thor (1998) "Finding Truth: The Human Mind as an Error-Checking Mechanism". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

May, Thor (29 January 2001) "Why Grasshoppers Don't Have A Problem". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

May, Thor (26 March 2001) "Student Activism : Truth and False Prophets". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

May, Thor (2003) "The Case for Favoritism". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

May, Thor (2008) "Corruption and Other Distortions as Variables in Language Education" ; TESOL Law Journal, Vol.2 March 2008; ( also on and online @

May, Thor (28 March, 2010) "Somebody Else’s Problem – Decision Making in China". Thor's New China Diary, online @

May, Thor (13 July 2011) "Why Write A PhD?". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

May, Thor (12 April 2012) "Déjà Vu and Wicked Stories". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

May, Thor (August 2013) "The Freedom Enterprise and Other Yarns". The Passionate Skeptic website, online @

Mises, Ludwig von (n.d.) "Chapter IV. A First Analysis of the Category of Action - 1. Ends and Means". Ludwig von Mises Institute website, online @

Pascoe, Michael (April 1, 2014) "Abandon principles and pay the price". Brisbane Times online @

Pruss, Alexander (Tuesday, August 5, 2008) "Means-end reasoning". Alexander Pruss's blog, online @

West, Michael (April 12, 2014) "A ban is no deterrent for bad behaviour". Sydney Morning Herald online @

Wikipedia (2014) "Means to an End". Wikipedia online @

Wikipedia (2014) "September 11 Attacks". Wikipedia online @

Wikipedia (2014) “0/11 Conspiracy Theories”. Wikipedia online @ 

Wikipedia (2014) “Casualties of the Iraq War”. Wikipedia online @


Wikipedia (2014) "Civilian casualties in the War in Afghanistan (2001–present)".  Wikipedia online @

Wikiquote (2014) "Means and Ends". Wikiquote website online @

Zinn, Howard (1991) "Machiavellian Realism and U.S. Foreign Policy: Means and Ends". Information Clearing House website, online @



The source of this document:


meetup group: Gentle Thinkers

discussion topics blog (for the list of proposed topics):

topics already discussed:

 comments: Thor May -;

Thor's own websites: 1. articles at ;
2. main site:



Professional bio: Thor May has a core professional interest in cognitive linguistics, at which he has rarely succeeded in making a living. He has also, perhaps fatally in a career sense, cultivated an interest in how things work – people, brains, systems, countries, machines, whatever… In the world of daily employment he has mostly taught English as a foreign language, a stimulating activity though rarely regarded as a profession by the world at large. His PhD dissertation, Language Tangle, dealt with language teaching productivity. Thor has been teaching English to non-native speakers, training teachers and lecturing linguistics, since 1976. This work has taken him to seven countries in Oceania and East Asia, mostly with tertiary students, but with a couple of detours to teach secondary students and young children. He has trained teachers in Australia, Fiji and South Korea. In an earlier life, prior to becoming a teacher, he had a decade of finding his way out of working class origins, through unskilled jobs in Australia, New Zealan d and finally England (after backpacking across Asia in 1972).  


academic repository: at
discussion: Thor's Unwise Ideas at



Crime without Punishment – the journey from means to ends   ©  Thor May 2014 



return to Thor's Unwise Ideas index
e-mail Thor May